
Q5: Can Field Liners be fitted to poles already in service?
A:This would probably be impracticable since the pole would have to be removed from
the ground in order to fit the Field Liner. Also, the Field Liner is a PRIMARY, PREVENTATIVE
treatment - if fitted to a pole BEFORE any rot has happened, it will prevent it from EVER happening.
Therefore, if a pole in service was excavated and found to be rotten, there would be no point in
fitting a Field Liner to it. On the other hand, if the pole was NOT rotten, a Field Liner would be
beneficial but impracticable. However, this question has been asked so many times over the years
that Biotrans scientists have now developed a Field Liner that CAN be fitted to poles in service.
Q6: Will the use of Field Liners slow down our installation process?
A:No - the poles can be delivered to the end-user by the treater with heatshrink Field Liners
already fitted, or alternatively, Woven Fabric Field Liners can be applied in 2 - 3 minutes by the
end-user at the side of the hole that the pole will be set in. The BioplastTM inner sleeve is an
integral part of each model.
Q7: Should Field Liners be used with ALL poles irrespective of preservative type?
A:For environmental reasons alone, there is no doubt that every preserved woodpole in the
ground should have a Field Liner on it.
While the most mobile of the 3 major ground-contact
preservatives used around the world is creosote, penta is also oil-based and visibly leaches
from poles in service.
Thirdly, while waterborne salts treatments like CCA have traditionally
been considered to have been "fixed" in poles, numerous documents published by the International
Research Group on Wood Preservation in recent years have documented their losses from wood in soil -
while at the practical level, documentation of rotten salts-treated woodpoles constitutes
a daily task of remedial treaters around the world.
Then, apart from the environmental reasons, when the point is reached at which
sufficient preservative has been lost from a pole, that pole is no longer protected from biodeterioration -
and that's when all the cost factors and financial losses associated with pole failure become a reality.
Q8: Why is there a small hole left at the bottom end of the Field Liner?
A:The hole is there to let the butt of the woodpole "breathe" and remain aerobic. If it
became stagnant, anaerobic bacteria would rot it.
The hole therefore allows 2 important things
to happen in this respect - it lets the pole continue acting as a "wick" that conducts groundwater
upwards, and it simultaneously prevents rainwater-buildup in the sleeved portion of the butt.
These two effects in turn combine to maintain a microaerophilic environment, with traces of
oxygen in the pole, that neither supports anaerobic bacteria nor does it support the strongly
oxidative wood-destroying fungi.
The Field Liner is actually a biotechnological device in this respect.
Q9: This is related to the last question - are you SURE that the Field Liner will not cause the
butt of the pole to become waterlogged?/
A:Six-year field trails have proven that this is not true - the interiors of the butts of
lined poles have actually had LOWER moisture contents than unlined ones.
Q10: This is also related to question 8 - if there's a hole at the bottom of the Field Liner to
permit water movement, won't that let the preservative escape from the pole?
A:The microstructural orientation of a woodpole in service prevents this - see the
drawing on the Home Page of this website. At the microscopic level, the treated outer sapwood
vessels surrounding the heartwood of a preserved woodpole in the ground resemble a bunch of
drinking straws held vertically around a piece of heartwood - and any liquid in them escapes largely
from their open ends at the bottom (of course, wood vessels are not 100% identical to drinking
straws in that they DO have pits in their sides that allow some lateral movement of liquids between
vessels in living trees, but such movement is relatively slight in poles). In the case of a pole with
a Field Liner fitted, the open ends at the bottoms of the outer sapwood vessels are closed off by
the overlap of the Field Liner, and the weight of the standing pole keeps the closure tight. Field
Trials have confirmed all this, and they showed that the preservative that diffused into the heartwood
with time actually IMPROVED standards in terms of producing increased depths of preservative
penetration.
Q11: What if the Field Liner is torn and has other holes in it? Won't that cause the pole to rot?
A:Folk sometimes imagine this to be a catastrophic event - rather like a balloon bursting -
but the reality is that if an unintentional hole occupies, say, 5% of the area of the Field Liner, very
little preservative leakage occurs because the hole doesn't actually "draw" preservative out of the
pole. You're left with at least 95% of the Field Liner's protection.
Q12: With preservatives moving down the pole by gravitational forces and becoming concentrated
there by the Field Liner, won't that result in the Field Liner eventually filling up with overflowing preservative?
A:Calculations show that the volume of preservative in the whole of a specification-treated pole
is less than the volume of wood in the below-ground region of the butt of that pole. So the Field Liner
cannot fill up with preservative from the pole - even if all of it ran down.
Q13: Well the results certainly show that the Field Liner protects the pole and greatly extends its
service life. But what about heartrot becoming a significant factor in the life cycles of poles whose service
lives have been greatly extended by the use of Field Liners?
A:The preserved sapwood of a woodpole contributes 90% of the bending strength of the pole,
and since woodpoles are biological material with a degree of variability in their physical properties, they are
conventionally 400% overengineered in pole specifications. Therefore, even if the untreated heartwood was
totally lost, the pole would still have sufficient strength to perform its functions. On the other hand, when
poles without Field Liners do succumb to heart rot, the less visible, but equally important, contribution from
concomitant shell rot has also played an important role in the failure of the pole. With a Field Liner in place
no shell rot whatsoever can occur, and indeed, lateral preservative diffusion with time even increases the
thickness of the preserved shell, so heartrot could never be sufficient to cause that pole to fail.
Q14: Many plastics contain phthalates which are harmful to fish and generally environmentally
undesirable. What about Field Liners in this regard?
A:All the plastics used in Field Liners are food-grade plastics with, for
example, EPA approvals for use in food contact, and they are also manufactured to
conform with European Directives as such. Even the masterbatch used to include
the fungicide with the BioplastTM is phthalate-free, so Field Liners are
completely free of phthalates and they are recyclable.
Q15: What if I think of any more questions? Do you have an MSDS? Do you have Users' Specifications
that I can read?
A:Contact any Biotrans personnel via their e-mail addresses (see
"Contacts") and they will be only to
pleased to discuss any points you wish to talk through.